E si asta si discutie ampla.
Experienta mea de condus multi ani si km cu auto diesel imi spune ca dieselul asigura frana motor mai eficienta. Dar nu e doar asta, MAC vs MAS.
Nu putem sa comparam 0.9 tce cu 2.5 tdi din acest pdv si nici macar cu 1.4 sau 1.6.
La 0.9 avem 3 cilindri. F important.
Netul e plin de discutii pe tema asta. Mai jos un mic extras. Mi se pare relevant.
[...]Then due to higher compression the Diesel Engine will have higher engine braking.
The other factors are
1. Final Gear Ratios. These may be less for Diesels, which will reduce breaking
2. Larger Capacity of Diesel Engine for similar power increases breaking
3. The ECU has a major influence on braking, as in some cases the ECU may cut off the fuel when the foot is off the accelerator pedal, in other cases ECU may allow enough fuel for the engine to idle, or the ECU may reduce the fuel at high speed, while allowing enough fuel to crawl at lower speeds. All this affects the braking effect.
Experienta mea de condus multi ani si km cu auto diesel imi spune ca dieselul asigura frana motor mai eficienta. Dar nu e doar asta, MAC vs MAS.
Nu putem sa comparam 0.9 tce cu 2.5 tdi din acest pdv si nici macar cu 1.4 sau 1.6.
La 0.9 avem 3 cilindri. F important.
Netul e plin de discutii pe tema asta. Mai jos un mic extras. Mi se pare relevant.
[...]Then due to higher compression the Diesel Engine will have higher engine braking.
The other factors are
1. Final Gear Ratios. These may be less for Diesels, which will reduce breaking
2. Larger Capacity of Diesel Engine for similar power increases breaking
3. The ECU has a major influence on braking, as in some cases the ECU may cut off the fuel when the foot is off the accelerator pedal, in other cases ECU may allow enough fuel for the engine to idle, or the ECU may reduce the fuel at high speed, while allowing enough fuel to crawl at lower speeds. All this affects the braking effect.
Comment